Current:Home > MarketsEx-Google workers sue company, saying it betrayed 'Don't Be Evil' motto -Wealth Momentum Network
Ex-Google workers sue company, saying it betrayed 'Don't Be Evil' motto
View
Date:2025-04-14 01:41:52
Three former Google employees have sued the company, alleging that Google's motto "Don't be evil" amounts to a contractual obligation that the tech giant has violated.
At the time the company hired the three software engineers, Rebecca Rivers, Sophie Waldman and Paul Duke, they signed conduct rules that included a "Don't be evil" provision, according to the suit.
The trio say they thought they were behaving in accordance with that principle when they organized Google employees against controversial projects, such as work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection during the Trump administration. The workers circulated a petition calling on Google to publicly commit to not working with CBP.
Google fired the three workers, along with a fourth, Laurence Berland, in November 2019 for "clear and repeated violations" of the company's data security policies. The four deny they accessed and leaked confidential documents as part of their activism.
In the lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Monday, Rivers, Waldman and Duke argue that they should receive monetary damages because the company allegedly retaliated against them when they tried to draw attention to Google's "doing evil," the suit states.
It may be an uphill battle to convince a jury of exactly what constitutes "evil." But the plaintiffs' lawyer, Laurie Burgess, said it is not beyond what courts regularly must decide.
"There are all sorts of contract terms that a jury is required to interpret: 'don't be evil' is not so 'out there' as to be unenforceable," she said. "Since Google's contract tells employees that they can be fired for failing to abide by the motto, 'don't be evil,' it must have meaning."
Google did not immediately return a request for comment.
The "Don't be evil" principle is often attributed to Paul Buchheit and Amit Patel, two early Google employees. The phrase was written on every white board at the company during its early years, according to the 2008 book Planet Google by Randall Stross.
"It became the one Google value that the public knew well, even though it was formally expressed at Google less pithily as, 'You can make money without doing evil,'" Stross wrote.
In 2018, there were reports suggesting that Google had removed "Don't be evil" from its code of conduct. But an updated version, dated September 2020, shows the phrase remains. It is unclear when the motto was re-introduced.
The suit comes amid a surge in labor activism at tech companies like Apple Facebook, Netflix and Amazon. A group of workers at Google, which is owned by Alphabet, formed a minority union earlier this year around issues including sexual harassment, its work with the Pentagon and the treatment of its sizable contract workforce.
The National Labor Relations Board is investigating the firing of the three Google workers who sued on Monday. The Board wrote in May that Google "arguably violated" federal labor law by "unlawfully discharging" Rivers, Duke and Waldman. The NLRB matter is awaiting a final resolution.
Meanwhile, the software engineers say Google should be punished for not living up to its own moral code.
"Google realized that 'don't be evil' was both costing it money and driving workers to organize," the ex-Googlers said in a statement on Monday. "Rather than admit that their stance had changed and lose the accompanying benefits to the company image, Google fired employees who were living the motto."
Editor's note: Google is among NPR's financial supporters.
veryGood! (3811)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Israel and Hamas war rages despite U.N. cease-fire demand, as U.N. envoy accuses Israel of genocide in Gaza
- 'We will never forget': South Carolina Mother, 3-year-old twin girls killed in collision
- Thousands pack narrow alleys in Cairo for Egypt's mega-Iftar
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Truck driver convicted of vehicular homicide for 2022 crash that killed 5 in Colorado
- Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers want to make public statements about stolen money. FBI says Murdaugh lied
- King Charles III Shares His Great Sadness After Missing Royal Event
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- ‘Murder in progress': Police tried to spare attacker’s life as they saved woman from assault
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- NTSB says police had 90 seconds to stop traffic, get people off Key Bridge before it collapsed
- To combat bullying and extremism, Air Force Academy turns to social media sleuthing
- Taylor Swift's father will not face charges for allegedly punching Australian photographer
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- March Madness games today: Everything to know about NCAA Tournament's Sweet 16 schedule
- 2024 NCAA Tournament: What to know about locations, dates, times and more for Sweet 16
- Carol Burnett recalls 'awful' experience performing before Elvis: 'Nobody wanted to see me'
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
Eva Mendes says she had 'non-verbal agreement' with Ryan Gosling to be a stay-at-home mom
Ex-New Mexico lawmaker facing more federal charges, accused of diverting money meant for schools
Last coal-burning power plant in New England set to close in a win for environmentalists
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
Hailey Bieber Goes Makeup-Free to Discuss Her Perioral Dermatitis Skin Condition
TikTok artist replicates 21 Eras Tour stadiums where Taylor Swift has performed
Baltimore bridge collapse and coping with gephyrophobia. The fear is more common than you think.
Like
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- I'm a Realtor. NAR settlement may not be as good for home buyers and sellers as they think.
- Potential Changes to Alternate-Fuel Standards Could Hike Gas Prices in California. Critics See a ‘Regressive Tax’ on Low-Income Communities